What is a major downfall for a networked worker? For me, the
answer is simple – balance! As a networked worker, or an individual with the
capability to access the web at work, I struggle to find the balance between
work life and home life (Madden and Jones, 2008). In a world where people can
do anything at any time – where do we draw the line?
Madden and Jones (2008) state that “questions about
work-life balance, what counts as overtime work, and the extent to which
personal online activity can spill into normal working hours have become more
pervasive as the internet is integrated into many workplaces” (p. 1). So should
we forbid access to the internet while at work? Absolutely not – and for good
reason. Let’s look at the pros and cons of workers with internet access at
work.
Pros:
- Access to a plethora of information which could better enable workers to complete their day-to-day tasks.
- Able to connect with individuals in the company from different parts of the world – the interconnectedness makes work more manageable in terms of teams across the company.
- Work can be done anywhere, anytime.
- Workers are able to stay connected to home and work simultaneously through their computers, cell phones, iPad, Kindle, and other technologically savvy machines.
- Networked workers can be more in tune with what is happening at work – between co-workers and also with managers. Communication lines may be more open.
- Networked workers trust technology – they expect to be able to use their cell phone, computer, and gadgets wherever they go.
- Access to many sites on the internet from online shopping to Facebook to YouTube. With all these sites available is the networked worker really working?
- Workers may use internet to chat with friends outside the company via instant messengers, Facebook chat, Twitter, etc. While using social media – is the networked worker sharing personal information or work information? This could be a tremendous issue in healthcare with the HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) – protecting patient information. I have seen firsthand healthcare workers who share patient information or information about their employer on Facebook – typically resulting in termination of the employee.
- Workers may not be able to strike the balance between their personal and professional lives leading to discontent and dissatisfied workers. Expectations must be clear for these workers to help them find balance. Madden and Jones (2008) explain that “22% of employed email users say they are expected to read and respond to work-related emails, even when they are not at work” (p. 27).
- No separation of personal life and work. Overstimulation of workers – always feeling the need to be connected to someone or something. “Americans tend to always be on or always be off” meaning people either always check their emails or they never do (Madden and Jones, 2008, p. 13).
- More connected may not mean more invested. As networked workers interact more with co-workers or managers professional lines may blur – making it more difficult to be professional on the job.
- These tools can be misused in a way that violates trust. Friedman (2007) explains “when terrorists take instruments from our daily lives – the car, the airplane, the tennis shoe, the cell phone – and turn them into weapons of indiscriminate violence, they reduce trust” (p. 557). This does not just include terrorists from outside our own countries – this also includes those we work with, go to the gym with, and are friends with – Friedman (2007) writes about cell phones not being allowed at the gym because people abused their use by taking nude photographs of people in the locker room and sharing them on the internet (p. 534).
The free use of internet at work can pose challenges for
both the networked worker and management at the organization. Friedman (2007)
writes “whatever the innovation, people will find a way to use it and abuse it”
(p. 534). The opportunity then, is to deter abuse of the free use of internet
in the workplace. Challenges present opportunities for organizations to
flourish or falter. What opportunities do the above challenges (cons) present?
Social media platforms such as Facebook or Twitter can be
utilized to help advertise for a business or organization. If used in a way
that is respectful to the organization networked workers can share good
information with the world. For example, a Facebook status such as: I love my
job! Starbucks is such a great place to work – my customers are amazing! would
promote the company’s image. Customers would see this status and think good
thoughts about Starbucks. If, on the other hand, customers saw this status: I
hate that place! The customers at Starbucks are all spoiled and rude – I can’t
wait to quit! would likely elicit an entirely different set of feelings.
Instant messaging presents an opportunity in that an
organization can utilize it for communication within the organization. A person who works on the tenth floor can send
an instant message rather than walking down several flights of stairs. Instant
messaging, for some, can seem more personal than emailing or even talking on the
phone.
If a company or organization does not want certain sites to
be visited from their internet source it is simple – block the site. Otherwise,
the internet can be used for research, connecting employees from around the
world, and for stimulating new ideas.
Pros and cons can be identified for any tool, gadget, or process
– for anything really. What is important is to try to view cons through a
different lens in order to develop innovative or creative ways to change the
con to a pro for the organization (Lowney, 2003). In doing so the organization will
be more technologically savvy, more adaptable to change, and more sustainable
for the future.
Friedman,
T.L. (2007). The world is flat: A brief
history of the twenty-first century. Farrar, Straus & Girous (Ed.). New
York, NY: Picador.
Lowney, C.
(2003) Heroic leadership: Best practices
from a 450-year-old company that changed the world. Chicago: Loyola Press.
Madden,
M., & Jones, S. (2008, September 24). Networked Workers. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2008/Networked-Workers.aspx
To: In Search of the Magis
ReplyDeleteFrom: NotScorates
One of the more interesting elements you touched on in this weeks’ blog was trust. As you indicated in your paper, Friedman talks about trust at both the global and individual levels. As leaders, this is particularly important for us in our organizations. If we are to get the most out of those tools, we need to have a workforce we can trust. That means hiring the right people, creating an environment where they self-police, and empowering them to get things done. I am a big believer that trust is a two way street and that if you show your trustworthy and treat people right, they will return the favor. As long as people are imperfect, there will always be abuses. However, if we hire right, create the right environment and manage work, I think we can limit the abuses within our organization to a minimum.
Trust is definitely a two way street! As leaders we can role model trustworthy behaviors and actions which can help our workforce to trust us. And you have a great point - hiring the right people and creating an environment where work is managed is vital to help keep the level of abuse down.
DeleteTrust is an interesting and often forgotten concept when it comes to technology deployments and implementations. I would also offer that while trust is a two way street it goes far beyond that of modeling appropriate use. At work we engage in multiple social interactions. The web as certainly increased the likelihood of those interactions. Blocking or filtering websites is not the answer as it does not teach appropriate behavior. A connected employer must trust their connected employees to balance there work life and their personal life while at work. As you mentioned it is difficult to determine what constitutes overtime. Many of us are guilty of using social media for personal reasons why at work. On the flip side many of us are guilty of working when we should be with our families. It is about establishing a climate and culture that understands and nurtures the work/life coexistence as it is only going to deepen as devices become cheaper, access becomes faster, and families and employers accept this as the new norm.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comments. I definitely see your point in regards to not blocking sites rather building trust and creating a climate and culture in which workers find a balance.
DeleteSarah,
ReplyDeleteGreat post. I really liked your con of "More connected doesn't mean more invested".
Yes this can be a major misunderstanding that companies have. Just because I am more connected doesn't mean I want to do more for the job. In fact many times it means the exact opposite. The added pressures to stay connected and to do more with less can quickly rub an individual the wrong way and actually demotivate them.
Great catch on this!!
Great post.
ReplyDeleteI liked your con of "More connected does not equal more invested". This is something that companies do not understand.
Providing more access and more data AND expecting more out of the individual because having more is always good is a misconception. Having more can be good if that also means having more time and/or flexibility to do the work.
This is were companies are not seeing to cons of the networked. They have bought into the allure of the Siren and cannot not see the gaping pit that could be right in front of them.
This is a fight that the workers need to bring to the attention of the leadership and help work out on the right balance.
Great catch!!
I completely agree with your statement about expecting more out of employees. If more is expected at work then allow the time at home to truly be that - time for you to connect with your loved ones. Otherwise, employees become disconnected and are turned off by the inability to connect at home. Thanks for your reply!
DeleteSarah -
ReplyDeleteIn your final "pro," I'd say that many of us trust technology more than we trust people. Or we at least trust the people online (that we've never met) more than many of the people we have face-to-face interactions with.
That can be both good and bad, I believe. Pro for the reasons you stated, but con for the increase in business fraud as well as personal struggles (the Manti Te'o situation comes to mind).
In the video Britt uploaded, it's interesting the number of couples who are meeting online these days. I think that certainly has to do with trusting technology to some degree, then later actually trusting a human being.
Your social media example with Starbucks made me chuckle. Check out "Cisco Fatty". It's along those same lines - http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/39874
-Josh
Oh my! "Cisco Fatty" was quite funny. We do often trust over the web much quicker than in person. I would propose that this may be due in part to feeling less vulnerable online than in person. We can hide behind our screens and our keyboards - but in person it's all or nothing.
DeleteSarah, nice post...but what I really enjoyed was the engaging conversation after your post in the comments.
ReplyDelete...which speaks to the power of the internet! :-)
It has been interesting to see "trust" rise as a concept in multiple blogs this week.
Thanks, Britt! I agree - the conversation has been outstanding this week!
DeleteGood point addressing how being more connected does not equate to being more invested. In my school setting it is evident that professional and personal lines are blurred as networked workers interact more with one another. However, just because individuals are able to connect more, does not mean that they are necessarily any more invested. While the interactions of networked workers could potentially make it more difficult to remain professional on the job, I also see the benefits. Colleagues that would otherwise not connect throughout the school day, are able to connect as networked workers. Through email, texts, shared Docs, and blogs, colleagues that are limited in face-to-face interactions due to logistics, are forging personal and professional relationships, often bridging divisional and departmental divides. Likewise, through the use of technology, administration and faculty are able to foster both personal and professional relationships as networked workers. While technology doesn’t serve as a replacement for personal contact, if it provides networked workers with an avenue for connecting with one another, it is far better than the alternative of not connecting.
ReplyDeleteKatie,
DeleteI really enjoyed your reply! I agree that while on the job the ability to stay connected helps us all feel more 'in tune' with each other. It can be hard logistically to connect with your co-workers during the day-to-day duties - especially as a teacher. I appreciate you pointing out that being a networked worker helps to bridge the divisional and department divides - nice! Great response! Thanks for providing me with some great insight!